{"id":8025,"date":"2020-07-11T20:07:17","date_gmt":"2020-07-11T20:07:17","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/focusgn.com\/asia-pacific\/?p=8025"},"modified":"2026-04-24T03:42:51","modified_gmt":"2026-04-24T06:42:51","slug":"the-star-claim-against-high-roller-rejected","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/focusgn.com\/asia-pacific\/the-star-claim-against-high-roller-rejected","title":{"rendered":"The Star claim against high roller rejected"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p>A Singapore player refused to pay gambling debts of over US$30 million he claims were caused by the mistakes of a baccarat dealer.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<!--more-->\n\n\n\n<p>Singapore.- The subsidiary of Australia&#8217;s The Star Entertainment in Singapore suffered a legal setback this week when a court rejected its claim to recoup gambling debts from a high roller.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>The Star Entertainment sued Dr. Wong Yew Choy at the Singapore International Commercial Court last March for a AU$43.2 million (US$30 million) gambling debt.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>The claim has now been rejected by the judge on public policy grounds, the Straits Times reports.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>The high roller had been flown into The Star&#8217;s Gold Coast casino in 2018 and asked or a cheque cashing facility that he later asked to be raised to AU$50 million (US$34,74 million). He left a blank cheque and accumulated losses of AU$43.2 million in baccarat, but back in Singaore ordered his bank to cancel the cheque. He blamed his losses on mistakes made by the dealer,  something the company later recognised in court.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>The player also said the company persuaded him to keep playing during its two-month stay despite  the accumulated debt. <\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Judge Jeremy Cooke said Singapore law did not enforce the recovery of money from a wager, citing a Singapore Court of Appeal ruling from 2002 and a section of Singapore\u2019s Civil Law Act that bans the recovery of gambling debts.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>The Star\u2019s lawyers argued that the player was an <strong><em><a aria-label=\"undefined (opens in a new tab)\" href=\"https:\/\/focusgn.com\/asia-pacific\/gold-coast-casino-aiming-for-local-high-rollers\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">experienced high roller<\/a><\/em><\/strong>, and did not claim the contract signed for the cheque cashing facility at the casino was invalid, and that therefore this section of the Act could not be applied to this international gambling debt.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>The argument on Dr. Wang\u2019s behalf was that the casino was trying to claim a gambling debt disguising it as an unpaid loan or credit facility.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>A Singapore player refused to pay gambling debts of over US$30 million he claims were caused by the mistakes of a baccarat dealer.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":8027,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"is_press_release":false,"is_interview":false,"is_opinion":false,"focusai_summary":"A Singapore court rejected The Star Entertainment's claim to recover a AU$43.2 million gambling debt from a high-roller, citing Singapore's public policy against enforcing such debts. This ruling underscores the jurisdictional complexities and enforceability challenges for international casino operators extending credit facilities to patrons from jurisdictions with stringent gambling debt recovery laws.","focusai_entities":"The Star Entertainment, Dr. Wong Yew Choy, Singapore International Commercial Court, Judge Jeremy Cooke","focusai_location":"Singapore, Australia, Gold Coast","focusai_target_profile":"ceo_executive (0.9), regulator (0.85), compliance_legal (0.95), operator_casino (0.95), payments_fraud_aml (0.75), investor_analyst (0.9), journalist_researcher (0.85)","focusai_suggestions":[{"label":"Impact on VIP Credit?","query":"What are the broader implications of this Singapore court ruling for integrated resort operators' global VIP credit extension policies and cross-border debt recovery strategies?"},{"label":"Regulatory Harmonization?","query":"How might this judgment influence discussions around international regulatory harmonization or bilateral agreements concerning the enforceability of gambling debts?"}],"footnotes":""},"categories":[439,16333],"tags":[169,21815],"class_list":["post-8025","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-legal-news","category-south-east-asia-news","tag-singapore","tag-the-star"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/focusgn.com\/asia-pacific\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8025","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/focusgn.com\/asia-pacific\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/focusgn.com\/asia-pacific\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/focusgn.com\/asia-pacific\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/focusgn.com\/asia-pacific\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=8025"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/focusgn.com\/asia-pacific\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8025\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":8063,"href":"https:\/\/focusgn.com\/asia-pacific\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8025\/revisions\/8063"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/focusgn.com\/asia-pacific\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/8027"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/focusgn.com\/asia-pacific\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=8025"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/focusgn.com\/asia-pacific\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=8025"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/focusgn.com\/asia-pacific\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=8025"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}