{"id":777032886,"date":"2025-10-09T08:54:31","date_gmt":"2025-10-09T11:54:31","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/focusgn.com\/asia-pacific\/?p=777032886"},"modified":"2026-04-21T18:22:21","modified_gmt":"2026-04-21T21:22:21","slug":"bet-right-fined-by-northern-territory-regulator-for-breaching-responsible-gambling-code","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/focusgn.com\/asia-pacific\/bet-right-fined-by-northern-territory-regulator-for-breaching-responsible-gambling-code","title":{"rendered":"Bet Right fined by Australian Northern Territory regulator for breaching responsible gambling code"},"content":{"rendered":"\n
The Northern Territory Racing Commission has issued an AU$13,430 fine to the bookmaker.<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
Australia.- The Northern Territory Racing and Wagering Commission (NTRWC)<\/strong> has fined Bet Right<\/strong> AU$13,430 (US$88,55) for breaching responsible gambling rules. According to an investigation by the regulator, the bookmaker ignored its obligations during a dispute with a customer.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Local media outlet The Straight reports that the case originated from a 2022 complaint<\/strong> filed by a Bet Right customer who said he did not see an email from the bookmaker because it landed in his junk folder. The email had been sent as part of a responsible gambling check regarding his betting behaviour.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Bet Right had promised to make a follow-up phone call to discuss the customer\u2019s gambling activity, but never did. The Commission found that the bookmaker\u2019s failure to follow through breached the Northern Territory Code for the Responsible Service of Online Gambling<\/strong>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n In its findings, the NTRWC described the missed follow-up as a \u201cmatter of concern\u201d that fell short of the required standard of care. The Commission said licensed operators have a duty to ensure all communications intended to address problem gambling concerns are properly followed up. <\/p>\n\n\n\n The regulator found that the bets placed by the complainant remained lawful and rejected the customer\u2019s request for repayment of losses.<\/p>\n\n\n\n