{"id":777003346,"date":"2023-03-15T14:02:42","date_gmt":"2023-03-15T17:02:42","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/focusgn.com\/asia-pacific\/?p=777003346"},"modified":"2026-04-22T23:44:20","modified_gmt":"2026-04-23T02:44:20","slug":"tabcorp-granted-access-to-documents-on-entain-aha-deal","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/focusgn.com\/asia-pacific\/tabcorp-granted-access-to-documents-on-entain-aha-deal","title":{"rendered":"Tabcorp granted access to documents on Entain-AHA deal"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p>Tabcorp has objected to the NSW Australian Hotels Association deal with Entain.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<!--more-->\n\n\n\n<p>Australia.- The New South Wales Supreme Court has granted Tabcorp access to legal advice that Entain and the NSW Australian Hotels Association (NSW AHA) may have received prior to&nbsp;<a rel=\"noreferrer noopener\" href=\"https:\/\/focusgn.com\/asia-pacific\/entain-to-promote-online-betting-brands-at-nsw-hotels\" target=\"_blank\">their planned promotion of Ladbrokes and Neds-branded betting venues<\/a>&nbsp;at hotels.&nbsp;Tabcorp has <a rel=\"noreferrer noopener\" href=\"https:\/\/focusgn.com\/asia-pacific\/tabcorp-launches-legal-action-against-entain-over-nsw-pubs-deal\" target=\"_blank\">objected to the deal<\/a>, arguing that it may infringe on its exclusivity agreement with the NSW AHA.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Tabcorp had previously written to Entain and NSW pubs to express concern that the advertising agreement breaches the<strong>&nbsp;<\/strong>New South Wales<strong>&nbsp;Illegal Gambling Act 1998<\/strong>. Bars and clubs in the state are only allowed to operate Tabcorp\u2019s retail gaming on their premises under a long-standing state licence now in place until 2033<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>The court agreed that the only way to determine whether this is the case is to examine company documents. Tabcorp has welcomed the court\u2019s decision, which grants preliminary discovery of the documents used by Entain and the NSW AHA in structuring their collaboration, including any legal advice regarding their agreement.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>The access granted by the court&nbsp;<strong>allows Tabcorp to scrutinise details of the commercial partnership<\/strong>&nbsp;and to challenge its legality if it&#8217;s found to be in violation of Tabcorp&#8217;s exclusivity wagering agreement or the Illegal Gambling Act.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Tabcorp has objected to the NSW Australian Hotels Association deal with Entain.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":176,"featured_media":21187,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"is_press_release":false,"is_interview":false,"is_opinion":false,"focusai_summary":"The New South Wales Supreme Court has granted Tabcorp preliminary discovery access to documents, including legal advice, related to a promotional deal between Entain and the NSW Australian Hotels Association. Tabcorp alleges this deal, promoting Ladbrokes and Neds brands in hotels, infringes its long-standing retail wagering exclusivity agreement with the NSW AHA and potentially breaches the New South Wales Illegal Gambling Act 1998. This decision allows Tabcorp to scrutinize the partnership's legality and challenge it if violations are found.","focusai_entities":"Tabcorp, Entain, NSW Australian Hotels Association, Ladbrokes, Neds","focusai_location":"Australia, New South Wales","focusai_target_profile":"ceo_executive (0.9), regulator (0.85), compliance_legal (0.95), operator_casino (0.9), investor_analyst (0.88), supplier_vendor (0.75), journalist_researcher (0.9)","focusai_suggestions":[{"label":"Impact on Entain's Strategy?","query":"How might the court's decision and potential legal challenge impact Entain's long-term retail expansion strategy and B2B partnership models within the Australian market?"},{"label":"Tabcorp's Exclusivity Implications?","query":"What are the potential financial and market share implications for Tabcorp if its retail wagering exclusivity agreement with the NSW AHA is ultimately upheld or successfully challenged?"}],"footnotes":""},"categories":[16336,439],"tags":[24207,13716],"class_list":["post-777003346","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-australasia-news","category-legal-news","tag-entain","tag-tabcorp"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/focusgn.com\/asia-pacific\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/777003346","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/focusgn.com\/asia-pacific\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/focusgn.com\/asia-pacific\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/focusgn.com\/asia-pacific\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/176"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/focusgn.com\/asia-pacific\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=777003346"}],"version-history":[{"count":4,"href":"https:\/\/focusgn.com\/asia-pacific\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/777003346\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":777003365,"href":"https:\/\/focusgn.com\/asia-pacific\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/777003346\/revisions\/777003365"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/focusgn.com\/asia-pacific\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/21187"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/focusgn.com\/asia-pacific\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=777003346"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/focusgn.com\/asia-pacific\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=777003346"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/focusgn.com\/asia-pacific\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=777003346"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}