{"id":777000986,"date":"2022-12-13T12:58:08","date_gmt":"2022-12-13T15:58:08","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/focusgn.com\/asia-pacific\/?p=777000986"},"modified":"2026-04-23T02:05:01","modified_gmt":"2026-04-23T05:05:01","slug":"levo-chan-denies-involvement-in-under-the-table-betting","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/focusgn.com\/asia-pacific\/levo-chan-denies-involvement-in-under-the-table-betting","title":{"rendered":"Levo Chan denies involvement in under-the-table betting"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p>Levo Chan Weng Lin has given testimony in his trial.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<!--more-->\n\n\n\n<p>Macau.- <strong>Levo Chan Weng Lin<\/strong>, the former head of&nbsp;<strong>Tak Chun<\/strong>, has denied that he or the company were ever involved in multiplier betting activities at Macau casinos. He gave testimony at The Court of First Instance on Monday (December 12).<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>He said: &#8220;The entire industry knows that some junket agents and representatives would engage in under-table betting with gamblers privately. But even officers from DICJ [the Macau Gaming Inspection and Coordination Bureau] had never found any of these betting activities in casinos, so it\u2019s even more difficult for my employees to find out.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Levo Chan Weng Lin<strong>&nbsp;<\/strong>was&nbsp;<a target=\"_blank\" href=\"https:\/\/focusgn.com\/asia-pacific\/macau-legend-development-ceo-resigns-after-arrest\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">arrested in January<\/a>&nbsp;with eight other people and was charged by Macau\u2019s Public Prosecution Office for leading a criminal gang, money laundering, running illegal gambling operations and running illegal gambling operations in a casino.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Four Macau casino operators <\/strong>are plaintiffs in the case. Wynn Macau claims damages in the case totalling HK$48.25m (US$6.21m), Sands China claims HK$46.99m (US$6.04m), SJM Holdings HK$35.64m (US$4.58m) and MGM China Holdings HK$3.82m (US$491,000).<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Previously, witnesses told the court that&nbsp;<a rel=\"noreferrer noopener\" href=\"https:\/\/focusgn.com\/asia-pacific\/proxy-betting-took-place-in-tak-chun-vip-rooms-court-hears\" target=\"_blank\">they conducted under-the-table betting at a Tak Chun VIP room<\/a>. A series of<strong>&nbsp;tutorial documents&nbsp;<\/strong>mentioning under-the-table bets, proxy bets and telephone bets was handed to the court.&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Levo Chan denied having seen such documents before. <strong>Lam Peng Fai<\/strong>, the presiding judge, asked him: \u201cSo are you not aware of the existence of the documents? Or are you not aware of the under-table betting operation in Tak Chun?\u2026 You have rights to clarify but you cannot talk nonsense.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Chan answered: \u201cI am not aware of under-table betting\u2026 I am not aware of such activities in Tak Chun. I also want to emphasize that the company [Tak Chun] and I had not given any instructions to employees about under-table betting.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Another judge on the three-person panel,&nbsp;<strong>Ip Sio Fan<\/strong>, asked: \u201cI don\u2019t understand how come you are aware of the existence of under-table betting in Macau but you are not aware of these activities taking place in the VIP rooms of Tak Chun?\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>He answered, \u201cNo one knows for sure whether the gamblers really engage in these bets.\u201d He also said he he was \u201crarely\u201d involved in the day-to-day operation of Tak Chun.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Tak Chun links with Suncity<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p>Levo Chan was also asked about the closure of Tak Chun shortly after&nbsp;<a rel=\"noreferrer noopener\" href=\"https:\/\/focusgn.com\/asia-pacific\/suncity-group-closes-all-vip-rooms-in-macau\" target=\"_blank\">Suncity Group Holdings closed its VIP rooms<\/a>&nbsp;in Macau following the&nbsp;<a rel=\"noreferrer noopener\" href=\"https:\/\/focusgn.com\/asia-pacific\/suncity-group-chairman-arrested-in-macau\" target=\"_blank\">arrest of Alvin Chau Cheok Wa<\/a>. Levo Chan denied having closed Tak Chun due to fears of similar charges and said the decision was taken because all six gaming operators had notified the company they would cease collaboration.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Chau is charged with similar crimes as Levo Chan: illicit gambling, running a criminal syndicate, fraud, and money laundering. The legal proceedings were<strong> <\/strong>completed last week and&nbsp;<a rel=\"noreferrer noopener\" href=\"https:\/\/focusgn.com\/asia-pacific\/alvin-chau-trial-verdict-set-for-january-18\" target=\"_blank\">a verdict will be delivered on January 18 2023<\/a>.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Levo Chan Weng Lin has given testimony in his trial.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":176,"featured_media":26452,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"is_press_release":false,"is_interview":false,"is_opinion":false,"focusai_summary":"Levo Chan Weng Lin, former head of Macau junket Tak Chun, testified in his trial, denying involvement in illegal \"under-table\" or \"multiplier betting\" activities, despite four casino operators claiming significant damages. This high-profile case underscores the ongoing regulatory crackdown on illicit gambling operations and money laundering within Macau's gaming sector, drawing parallels with the Suncity Group case.","focusai_entities":"Levo Chan Weng Lin, Tak Chun, DICJ, Wynn Macau, Sands China, SJM Holdings, MGM China Holdings, Lam Peng Fai, Ip Sio Fan, Suncity Group Holdings, Alvin Chau Cheok Wa, Macau\u2019s Public Prosecution Office","focusai_location":"Macau","focusai_target_profile":"ceo_executive (0.9), regulator (1.0), compliance_legal (1.0), operator_casino (1.0), payments_fraud_aml (0.8), investor_analyst (0.95), journalist_researcher (0.95)","focusai_suggestions":[{"label":"Impact on Macau VIP Segment?","query":"What are the long-term implications of these high-profile junket trials on Macau's VIP segment and the operational models of integrated resorts?"},{"label":"DICJ Enforcement Evolution?","query":"How will the DICJ's enforcement posture evolve following the verdicts in the Tak Chun and Suncity cases, particularly regarding B2B licensing and oversight of remaining junket operations?"}],"footnotes":""},"categories":[16338,439],"tags":[24187],"class_list":["post-777000986","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-east-asia-news","category-legal-news","tag-tak-chun-group"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/focusgn.com\/asia-pacific\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/777000986","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/focusgn.com\/asia-pacific\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/focusgn.com\/asia-pacific\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/focusgn.com\/asia-pacific\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/176"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/focusgn.com\/asia-pacific\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=777000986"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/focusgn.com\/asia-pacific\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/777000986\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":777001016,"href":"https:\/\/focusgn.com\/asia-pacific\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/777000986\/revisions\/777001016"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/focusgn.com\/asia-pacific\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/26452"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/focusgn.com\/asia-pacific\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=777000986"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/focusgn.com\/asia-pacific\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=777000986"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/focusgn.com\/asia-pacific\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=777000986"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}