{"id":34612,"date":"2022-10-20T09:38:45","date_gmt":"2022-10-20T12:38:45","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/focusgn.com\/asia-pacific\/?p=34612"},"modified":"2026-04-23T03:46:19","modified_gmt":"2026-04-23T06:46:19","slug":"neda-banning-pogos-could-benefit-the-philippines-tourism-sector","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/focusgn.com\/asia-pacific\/neda-banning-pogos-could-benefit-the-philippines-tourism-sector","title":{"rendered":"NEDA: Banning POGOs could benefit the Philippines&#8217; tourism sector"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p>According to a member of the National Economic and Development Authority, fraudulent activities linked to POGOS damage the country&#8217;s reputation.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<!--more-->\n\n\n\n<p>The Philippines.- <strong>Sarah Lynne Ducanes<\/strong>, assistant secretary for the Policy and Planning Group at the National Economic and Development Authority (NEDA) has added her voice to the Senate debate about&nbsp;<a rel=\"noreferrer noopener\" href=\"https:\/\/focusgn.com\/asia-pacific\/philippine-senator-wants-bpos-to-replace-pogos\" target=\"_blank\">whether to ban POGOs<\/a>&nbsp;in the Philippines. She has told a Senate committee that&nbsp;a ban could eventually benefit the country&#8217;s <strong>tourism sector<\/strong>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>According to the Philippine Inquirer newspaper, Ducanes said POGOs were affecting the <strong>Philippines&#8217; reputation <\/strong>among potential investors.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>She said: &#8220;Not because of POGO per see, but the fraudulent activities [associated with it] can put us in that [black] list or has put us in that list. That can affect this entire economic environment that we&#8217;re trying to create to attract investments both local and foreign.&#8221;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>According to preliminary NEDA estimates, POGOs generate a<strong> net cost<\/strong> to the country&#8217;s tourism industry, particularly Chinese tourism. Ducanes acknowledged that banning POGOs would result in some losses, such as office rental income. But she said a rebound in tourism could eventually offset the losses.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>However, House Representative&nbsp;<strong>Joey Salceda<\/strong> said NEDA&#8217;s assessment was highly speculative. He said the drop in Chinese tourists was not because of offshore gaming companies but because of&nbsp;<a rel=\"noreferrer noopener\" href=\"https:\/\/focusgn.com\/asia-pacific\/no-end-in-sight-for-chinas-zero-covid-policy\" target=\"_blank\">China&#8217;s strict policies<\/a>&nbsp;on outbound tourists due to the Covid-19 pandemic.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>According to Salceda, the number of Chinese tourists in Cambodia and the United Arab Emirates fell by about the same percentage as the number in the Philippines. He said: &#8220;It\u2019s very clear here that there is <strong>no difference<\/strong> if you have a POGO or not. China really has not allowed tourists to get out because of their zero-Covid policy.&#8221;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">China&#8217;s black list<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p>The president of the Philippine Senate,&nbsp;<strong>Juan Miguel Zubiri<\/strong>, has claimed that China has placed the Philippines on its tourist destination blacklist due to concerns about the offshore gambling industry. Although the Chinese Embassy in Manila denies it, Zubiri said that he was informed by Chinese ambassador&nbsp;<strong>Huang Xilian<\/strong>&nbsp;during a&nbsp;<a rel=\"noreferrer noopener\" href=\"https:\/\/focusgn.com\/asia-pacific\/philippine-senate-committee-to-study-potential-impact-of-banning-pogos\" target=\"_blank\">session studying the potential impact of banning POGOs<\/a>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>In 2020, the Chinese government established&nbsp;<a rel=\"noreferrer noopener\" href=\"https:\/\/focusgn.com\/asia-pacific\/china-continues-to-expand-gambling-blacklist\" target=\"_blank\">a blacklist of destinations<\/a>&nbsp;to which cross-border transfers are controlled. The&nbsp;<strong>blacklist<\/strong>&nbsp;is compiled by multiple departments, including the Ministry of Culture and Tourism, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and the Ministry of Public Security. In March 2021, China\u2019s revised Criminal Law made it illegal to assist cross-border gambling.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>If the Philippines has been included on the list, it could significantly affect tourism as China is among the main sources of tourist arrivals, although the number has dropped massively since the start of the Covid-19 pandemic.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>According to a member of the National Economic and Development Authority, fraudulent activities linked to POGOS damage the country&#8217;s reputation.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":176,"featured_media":18526,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"is_press_release":false,"is_interview":false,"is_opinion":false,"focusai_summary":"The Philippine Senate is debating a potential ban on Philippine Offshore Gaming Operators (POGOs), with the National Economic and Development Authority (NEDA) arguing that associated fraudulent activities damage the country's reputation and deter investment, despite acknowledging short-term economic losses. Conversely, a House Representative suggests the decline in Chinese tourism is due to China's zero-Covid policy, not POGOs, while the Senate President claims China has blacklisted the Philippines over offshore gambling concerns.","focusai_entities":"National Economic and Development Authority, NEDA, Sarah Lynne Ducanes, Philippine Inquirer, Joey Salceda, Juan Miguel Zubiri, Chinese Embassy in Manila, Huang Xilian, Ministry of Culture and Tourism, Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Ministry of Public Security","focusai_location":"Philippines, Cambodia, United Arab Emirates, China, Manila","focusai_target_profile":"ceo_executive (0.9), regulator (1.0), compliance_legal (0.9), operator_casino (1.0), payments_fraud_aml (0.7), investor_analyst (0.9), supplier_vendor (0.8), journalist_researcher (0.9)","focusai_suggestions":[{"label":"POGO Ban Economic Impact?","query":"What is the projected NGR impact on the Philippine treasury from a POGO ban, considering both direct and indirect economic effects on gaming verticals and tourism?"},{"label":"Regulatory Framework Evolution?","query":"What specific governance frameworks are being considered to mitigate the identified fraudulent activities and reputational risks if POGOs are not banned, and how would this affect B2B\/B2C licensing?"}],"footnotes":""},"categories":[157,16333],"tags":[23911,15789],"class_list":["post-34612","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-business-news","category-south-east-asia-news","tag-gambling-regulation","tag-pogos"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/focusgn.com\/asia-pacific\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/34612","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/focusgn.com\/asia-pacific\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/focusgn.com\/asia-pacific\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/focusgn.com\/asia-pacific\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/176"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/focusgn.com\/asia-pacific\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=34612"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/focusgn.com\/asia-pacific\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/34612\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":34640,"href":"https:\/\/focusgn.com\/asia-pacific\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/34612\/revisions\/34640"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/focusgn.com\/asia-pacific\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/18526"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/focusgn.com\/asia-pacific\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=34612"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/focusgn.com\/asia-pacific\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=34612"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/focusgn.com\/asia-pacific\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=34612"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}