{"id":29455,"date":"2022-05-02T07:21:22","date_gmt":"2022-05-02T10:21:22","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/focusgn.com\/asia-pacific\/?p=29455"},"modified":"2026-04-23T09:07:57","modified_gmt":"2026-04-23T12:07:57","slug":"macau-court-rules-in-favour-of-lvs-in-aaec-case","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/focusgn.com\/asia-pacific\/macau-court-rules-in-favour-of-lvs-in-aaec-case","title":{"rendered":"Macau court rules in favour of LVS in AAEC case"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p>The Court of First Instance has ruled in favour of Las Vegas Sands Corp (LVS) in the case brought by Asian American Entertainment Corp Ltd (AAEC).<\/p>\n\n\n\n<!--more-->\n\n\n\n<p>Macau.- The\u00a0legal battle between <strong>Las Vegas Sands<\/strong> and <strong>Asian American Entertainment Corp\u00a0<\/strong>appears to be over for now with a judgement in LVS&#8217;s favour. The Court of First Instance has ruled in favour of LVS in a case that began two decades ago.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>AAEC was claiming <strong>US$7.5bn<\/strong>\u00a0from LVS for breach of contract. The two companies had signed a partnership in October 2001 with a view to exploring a potential bid for a Macau concession, however, LVS ultimately partnered with\u00a0<strong>Galaxy Entertainment<\/strong>, with whom it won a licence.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>LVS\u2019s lawyer claimed that&nbsp;<a target=\"_blank\" href=\"https:\/\/focusgn.com\/asia-pacific\/lvs-blames-aaec-for-failed-partnership-on-macau-casino-licence\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">AAEC was the first to break up the partnership<\/a><strong>&nbsp;<\/strong>and trade with rivals including Hong Kong entrepreneur Lui Che Woo. The lawyer also denied the other party\u2019s claim that Las Vegas Sands gave Galaxy Casino SA access to confidential bidding documents prepared by Asian American Entertainment.&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>He said the final bid, which originally combined the capabilities of Las Vegas Sands and Galaxy Casino SA, was based entirely on the US group\u2019s resort business model for the Venetian Las Vegas casino in Las Vegas, Nevada.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>In February,\u00a0<strong>Judge Seng Ioi Man<\/strong>, sitting at Macau\u2019s Court of First Instance, said\u00a0<a rel=\"noreferrer noopener\" href=\"https:\/\/focusgn.com\/asia-pacific\/macau-judge-no-evidence-that-lvs-aaec-partnership-would-have-won-a-licence\" target=\"_blank\">there was no proof<\/a>\u00a0that\u00a0<strong>AAEC\u00a0<\/strong>had a definitive agreement to tie with\u00a0<strong>LVS<\/strong>\u00a0to bid for a Macau gaming concession.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>AAEC attorney <strong>Jorge Menezes <\/strong>told local media he would appeal the decision.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The Court of First Instance has ruled in favour of Las Vegas Sands Corp (LVS) in the case brought by Asian American Entertainment Corp Ltd (AAEC).<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":176,"featured_media":16477,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"is_press_release":false,"is_interview":false,"is_opinion":false,"focusai_summary":"The Court of First Instance in Macau has ruled in favor of Las Vegas Sands Corp (LVS) in a two-decade-old breach of contract claim brought by Asian American Entertainment Corp Ltd (AAEC). AAEC had sought US$7.5bn, alleging LVS breached a partnership agreement related to a Macau gaming concession bid, but the court found no definitive agreement existed. This judgment resolves a significant contingent liability for LVS, though AAEC plans to appeal.","focusai_entities":"Las Vegas Sands Corp (LVS), Asian American Entertainment Corp Ltd (AAEC), Galaxy Entertainment, Galaxy Casino SA, Lui Che Woo, Seng Ioi Man, Jorge Menezes","focusai_location":"Macau, Las Vegas, Nevada, Hong Kong","focusai_target_profile":"ceo_executive (0.95), regulator (0.75), compliance_legal (0.9), operator_casino (0.85), investor_analyst (0.98), journalist_researcher (0.9)","focusai_suggestions":[{"label":"Appeal Impact","query":"What is the estimated timeline and potential impact of AAEC's stated appeal on LVS's operational stability and capital market perception, considering the protracted nature of the initial litigation?"},{"label":"Concession Bid Precedent","query":"How might this ruling influence the structuring of future B2B partnership agreements and confidentiality clauses for gaming concession bids in other regulated jurisdictions, particularly regarding the definition of a 'definitive agreement'?"}],"footnotes":""},"categories":[16338,439],"tags":[24032,1642],"class_list":["post-29455","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-east-asia-news","category-legal-news","tag-asian-american-entertainment-corporation","tag-las-vegas-sands"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/focusgn.com\/asia-pacific\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/29455","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/focusgn.com\/asia-pacific\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/focusgn.com\/asia-pacific\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/focusgn.com\/asia-pacific\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/176"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/focusgn.com\/asia-pacific\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=29455"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/focusgn.com\/asia-pacific\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/29455\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":29489,"href":"https:\/\/focusgn.com\/asia-pacific\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/29455\/revisions\/29489"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/focusgn.com\/asia-pacific\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/16477"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/focusgn.com\/asia-pacific\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=29455"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/focusgn.com\/asia-pacific\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=29455"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/focusgn.com\/asia-pacific\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=29455"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}