{"id":28943,"date":"2022-04-13T09:24:38","date_gmt":"2022-04-13T12:24:38","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/focusgn.com\/asia-pacific\/?p=28943"},"modified":"2026-04-23T09:38:31","modified_gmt":"2026-04-23T12:38:31","slug":"former-ipi-chairwoman-to-pay-42200-in-court-imposed-sanctions","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/focusgn.com\/asia-pacific\/former-ipi-chairwoman-to-pay-42200-in-court-imposed-sanctions","title":{"rendered":"Former IPI chairwoman to pay $42,200 in court-imposed sanctions"},"content":{"rendered":"\n

Cui Li Jie is a witness in the case of seven construction workers who accuse IPI of labour abuse and human trafficking.<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n

Northern Mariana Islands.-\u00a0Chief Judge Ramona V. Manglona\u00a0<\/strong>has confirmed that former IPI chairwoman Cui Li Jie must pay court fines totaling $42,200. According to Cui, the fees owned total $36,200 but the court\u2019s calculations come out at $42,200<\/strong>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The courts have repeatedly found that\u00a0Cui Li Jie violated<\/strong> court orders regarding electronically stored information or ESI. Cui is a witness in the lawsuit brought\u00a0against IPI and its former contractors and subcontractors MCC International and Gold Mantis Construction Decoration by seven construction workers. The plaintiffs allege labour rights violations and human trafficking.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Last December, Manglona had ordered\u00a0Cui Li Jie<\/strong>\u00a0to\u00a0pay a daily sanction of US$200 per day<\/a>\u00a0for failing to comply with the court order to hand over electronic data. The fine for contempt of court would apply from December 23 until Cui complied.\u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The daily fine was later\u00a0increased to $1,000<\/a>. Cui and the plaintiffs then reached an agreement through attorneys Aaron Halegua and Bruce Berline to proceed with the evidentiary hearings scheduled for January 27, 2022 to February 8, 2022. As part of the deal, Cui agreed to continue to accrue $1,000 in fines per day,<\/p>\n\n\n\n

On February 3, 2022,\u00a0the judge partially granted the plaintiffs’ request to extend the time<\/strong>\u00a0allowed for Berline to return to Saipan. The court then postponed the hearing to February 18, 2022, and later to March 8, 2022 due to scheduling issues and unforeseen circumstances.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Daily sanctions were suspended from February 8 until the new evidentiary hearing date. Evidence hearings then began on March 8.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Judge Manglona said: \u201cGiven that Cui presented sufficient evidence demonstrating that she purged her contempt, the court will not impose sanctions\u00a0<\/strong>during the period she was presenting evidence to prove that she purged her contempt.”<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Cui Li Jie is a witness in the case of seven construction workers who accuse IPI of labour abuse and human trafficking.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":176,"featured_media":19434,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"is_press_release":false,"is_interview":false,"is_opinion":false,"focusai_summary":"Former IPI chairwoman Cui Li Jie has been ordered to pay $42,200 in court fines for repeatedly violating court orders regarding electronically stored information (ESI) in a labor abuse and human trafficking lawsuit against IPI. The fines accumulated due to her failure to comply with directives to hand over electronic data, highlighting significant corporate governance and legal compliance challenges for the iGaming operator.","focusai_entities":"Cui Li Jie, IPI, Ramona V. Manglona, MCC International, Gold Mantis Construction Decoration, Aaron Halegua, Bruce Berline","focusai_location":"Northern Mariana Islands, Saipan","focusai_target_profile":"ceo_executive (0.9), regulator (0.85), compliance_legal (1.0), operator_casino (0.9), tech_data (0.75), investor_analyst (0.9), journalist_researcher (0.95)","focusai_suggestions":[{"label":"IPI's Governance Impact?","query":"What are the long-term implications of this executive's non-compliance for IPI's corporate governance framework and its standing with regulatory bodies?"},{"label":"Regulatory Scrutiny Increase?","query":"Will this case prompt increased regulatory scrutiny on IPI's operational integrity and its adherence to broader corporate responsibility standards beyond gaming-specific compliance?"}],"footnotes":""},"categories":[16336,439],"tags":[14213,22674],"class_list":["post-28943","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-australasia-news","category-legal-news","tag-imperial-pacific","tag-ipi"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/focusgn.com\/asia-pacific\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/28943","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/focusgn.com\/asia-pacific\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/focusgn.com\/asia-pacific\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/focusgn.com\/asia-pacific\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/176"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/focusgn.com\/asia-pacific\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=28943"}],"version-history":[{"count":4,"href":"https:\/\/focusgn.com\/asia-pacific\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/28943\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":28967,"href":"https:\/\/focusgn.com\/asia-pacific\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/28943\/revisions\/28967"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/focusgn.com\/asia-pacific\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/19434"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/focusgn.com\/asia-pacific\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=28943"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/focusgn.com\/asia-pacific\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=28943"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/focusgn.com\/asia-pacific\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=28943"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}