casino licence in Macau in 2002<\/strong> when the US operator switched partners.<\/p>\n\n\n\nIt is seeking\u00a0damages calculated at around 70 per cent of Sands\u2019 Macau profits\u00a0<\/strong>from 2004 to 2022.\u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n\nOn September 4 2019, AAEC was allowed to increase its initial MOP3bn claim to MOP96.45bn (US$12bn) <\/strong>for lost profits from 2004 to 2018 while reserving its right to claim for lost profits up to 2022 in due course at the enforcement stage. LVS\u2019 appeal over this decision is still pending.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"Carlos Lobo, a former advisor to Macau\u2019s gaming commission has told Macau’s Court of First Instance that AAEC was an experienced company in the finance sector, but did not have experience in tourism or casinos.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":176,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"is_press_release":false,"is_interview":false,"is_opinion":false,"focusai_summary":"A Macau court is hearing a lawsuit where AAEC alleges Las Vegas Sands (LVS) breached a 2002 contract for a casino license, seeking US$12bn in damages. Testimony from a former gaming commission advisor highlighted AAEC's lack of casino experience and concerns over potential money laundering risks associated with their proposal to develop a bank alongside a gaming concession. The trial continues, focusing on the contractual split between LVS and AAEC prior to the concession award.","focusai_entities":"Carlos Lobo, AAEC, Las Vegas Sands (LVS), Macau\u2019s gaming commission, Venetian, Galaxy Entertainment, Jorge Menezes","focusai_location":"Macau, Hong Kong, US","focusai_target_profile":"ceo_executive (0.9), regulator (0.9), compliance_legal (0.95), operator_casino (0.85), investor_analyst (0.95), supplier_vendor (0.7), journalist_researcher (0.9)","focusai_suggestions":[{"label":"LVS Financial Impact?","query":"What is the projected financial impact on Las Vegas Sands' balance sheet and future earnings if the MOP96.45bn claim is upheld, considering their current Macau GGR and NGR?"},{"label":"Regulatory Precedent?","query":"How might the court's ruling on the contractual breach and the gaming commission's due diligence in 2002 influence future B2B\/B2C licensing processes and partnership vetting in Macau and other regulated iGaming jurisdictions?"}],"footnotes":""},"categories":[16338,156],"tags":[23907,1642,23906],"class_list":["post-19372","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-east-asia-news","category-regulation-news","tag-land-based-casino","tag-las-vegas-sands","tag-macau-casinos"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/focusgn.com\/asia-pacific\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/19372","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/focusgn.com\/asia-pacific\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/focusgn.com\/asia-pacific\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/focusgn.com\/asia-pacific\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/176"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/focusgn.com\/asia-pacific\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=19372"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/focusgn.com\/asia-pacific\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/19372\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":19415,"href":"https:\/\/focusgn.com\/asia-pacific\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/19372\/revisions\/19415"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/focusgn.com\/asia-pacific\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=19372"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/focusgn.com\/asia-pacific\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=19372"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/focusgn.com\/asia-pacific\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=19372"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}