{"id":19071,"date":"2021-06-16T14:52:09","date_gmt":"2021-06-16T14:52:09","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/focusgn.com\/asia-pacific\/?p=19071"},"modified":"2026-04-23T18:30:22","modified_gmt":"2026-04-23T21:30:22","slug":"debate-over-dates-as-aaec-lawsuit-against-las-vegas-sands-resumes","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/focusgn.com\/asia-pacific\/debate-over-dates-as-aaec-lawsuit-against-las-vegas-sands-resumes","title":{"rendered":"Debate over dates as AAEC lawsuit against Las Vegas Sands resumes"},"content":{"rendered":"\n
Asian American Entertainment Corporation’s (AAEC) US$12m lawsuite against Las Vegas Sands has resumed today after a delay of a year.<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
Macau.- The court showdown between Las Vegas Sands (LVS) and Asian American Entertainment Corporation (AAEC)\u00a0<\/strong>has resumed today, beginning with debate about\u00a0whether the US casino giant was still a partner\u00a0<\/strong>of AAEC when it partnered with Hong Kong\u2019s Galaxy Entertainment.<\/p>\n\n\n\n AAEC initiated the lawsuit in 2012, arguing that\u00a0Sands breached its contract<\/a>\u00a0for a\u00a0casino licence in Macau in 2002<\/strong>\u00a0when the US operator switched partners.<\/p>\n\n\n\n However, according to Las Vegas Sands,\u00a0its partnership with AAEC ended before\u00a0<\/strong>the Macau government announced the results of its licence tender.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Its legal team stated that a letter that was sent to Macau\u2019s then chief executive<\/strong> Edmund Ho Hau Wah showing the casino had already ended its relationship with AAEC on January 15, 2002.<\/p>\n\n\n\n According to Reuters, Marshall Hao\u2019s<\/strong> AAEC is seeking damages calculated at around 70 per cent of Sands\u2019 Macau profits <\/strong>from 2004 to 2022. <\/p>\n\n\n\n On September 4 2019,\u00a0AAEC was allowed to increase its initial MOP3bn claim to MOP96.45bn (US$12bn) for lost profits from 2004 to 2018\u00a0<\/strong>while reserving its right to claim for lost profits up to 2022 in due course at the enforcement stage. LVS\u2019 appeal over this decision is still pending.<\/p>\n\n\n\n