{"id":35925,"date":"2026-10-23T01:25:26","date_gmt":"2026-10-23T04:25:26","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/focusgn.com\/africa\/?p=35925"},"modified":"2026-10-23T03:51:35","modified_gmt":"2026-10-23T06:51:35","slug":"nigeria-federal-lottery-regulation","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/focusgn.com\/africa\/nigeria-federal-lottery-regulation","title":{"rendered":"Nigeria gaming regulators challenge federal lottery oversight"},"content":{"rendered":"\n
The dispute centres on the boundary between federal consumer protection and state authority over lotteries and games of chance.<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
Key takeaways:<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n Nigeria.- Nigeria\u2019s Federation of State Gaming Regulators<\/strong> (FSGRN) has challenged proposed federal sales-promotion regulations, arguing that provisions covering lotteries and prize draws could encroach on state gaming authorities\u2019 powers<\/strong>. The dispute raises questions about the boundary between federal consumer protection and state-level gaming regulation following the Supreme Court\u2019s 2024 ruling on lottery oversight.<\/p>\n\n\n\n The FSGRN, in a statement published by Premium Times on October 21, called on the Federal Competition and Consumer Protection Commission (FCCPC) to amend its Draft Sales Promotion (Amended) Regulations, 2026<\/strong>. The federation objects to provisions it says would give the FCCPC regulatory, licensing, approval and supervisory powers over lotteries, promotional lotteries, prize draws and related gaming activities.<\/p>\n\n\n\n The federation argues that these activities fall within the jurisdiction of state gaming authorities and that the draft risks reintroducing federal lottery oversight through a separate regulatory framework. It has also called on the Attorney-General of the Federation to ensure that federal agencies respect the Supreme Court\u2019s judgment<\/strong>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n In November 2024, Nigeria\u2019s Supreme Court nullified the National Lottery Act 2005<\/strong>, ruling that the National Assembly lacked the constitutional authority to regulate lotteries and games of chance within the states. The court issued a perpetual injunction restraining federal enforcement of the Act in the plaintiff states, while the Federal Capital Territory remained within the National Assembly\u2019s legislative jurisdiction<\/strong>. The judgment concerned the National Lottery Act, not the FCCPC\u2019s 2026 draft regulations.<\/p>\n\n\n\n The draft was published on September 30, and the stated comment deadline was October 20. The proposed amendments<\/strong> update Nigeria\u2019s existing sales-promotion rules and modify applicable notification fees. The commission said the consultation was intended to gather input on measures to protect consumers and ensure fair promotional practices.<\/p>\n\n\n\n The draft has also drawn criticism<\/strong> from the Foundation for Consumer Freedom Advancement (FCFA), which submitted comments ahead of the consultation deadline. The organisation supports measures to prevent fraudulent promotions but argues that some proposed requirements could extend too broadly to ordinary commercial advertising and discounts. Its concerns are separate from the FSGRN\u2019s constitutional objections.<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n
Frequently asked questions (FAQs)<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
\n