{"id":34458,"date":"2026-10-05T02:50:36","date_gmt":"2026-10-05T05:50:36","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/focusgn.com\/africa\/?p=34458"},"modified":"2026-10-06T05:04:08","modified_gmt":"2026-10-06T08:04:08","slug":"kenya-gambling-licensing-case-heads-back-to-court","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/focusgn.com\/africa\/kenya-gambling-licensing-case-heads-back-to-court","title":{"rendered":"Kenya gambling licensing case heads back to court"},"content":{"rendered":"\n
Judgment was expected on October 2, but three interested parties have been given more time to respond before the case returns for further directions.<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
Key takeaways:<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n Kenya.- Kenya\u2019s High Court did not deliver the judgment expected on October 2 in a legal challenge to the country\u2019s gambling licensing framework<\/strong>. Instead, the matter has been scheduled for mention on October 12 for further directions, according to a statement by the Association of Gaming Operators Kenya (AGOK).<\/p>\n\n\n\n The development relates to Judicial Review No. E251 of 2026<\/strong>, Thomas Buckley Opar Owuor and another vs 2 others. In its court update, AGOK said the court granted the 3rd, 4th and 5th Interested Parties additional time to respond.<\/p>\n\n\n\n AGOK said: \u201cState Counsel was also granted time to review the related David Biketi and Sharkscode constitutional petitions and their potential implications for the proceedings.\u201d <\/p>\n\n\n\n The association added that \u201cthe matter is scheduled for mention on Monday, 12 October 2026, for further directions.\u201d AGOK said it would continue to monitor developments<\/strong> and keep its members informed.<\/p>\n\n\n The case is significant for Kenya\u2019s gambling industry because it challenges provisions of the Gambling Control (Licensing) Regulations, 2026<\/a>, including increased licence fees and gambling capital requirements.<\/p>\n\n\n\n The case was brought by Thomas Buckley Opar Owuor and Ken Brance against the Prime Cabinet Secretary, the Gambling Regulatory Authority<\/strong> of Kenya (GRA) and the Attorney General, with AGOK and Safaricom listed as interested parties.<\/p>\n\n\n\n The High Court initially stayed implementation of the regulations in July. In August, the court narrowed the stay<\/a> to the increased fees under the Second Schedule and gambling capital requirements under the Third Schedule, allowing the other provisions to take effect.<\/p>\n\n\n\n A subsequent ruling allowed the disputed fees to be implemented for licensing purposes, although they could not be enforced while the legal challenge<\/strong> was pending and would have to be refunded if ultimately found unlawful.<\/p>\n\n\n\n The court had set October 2, 2026 for judgment in the substantive judicial review. The court had maintained the date<\/a> following proceedings involving concerns raised by AGOK over alleged communications relating to operators\u2019 Paybills.<\/p>\n\n\n\n The new licensing framework includes a KES50m (US$387,500) licence fee for online bookmakers and online casinos and KES20m (US$155,000) for online lottery operators.<\/p>\n\n\n\n <\/p>\n\n\n\n
