{"id":33804,"date":"2026-09-23T01:39:25","date_gmt":"2026-09-23T04:39:25","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/focusgn.com\/africa\/?p=33804"},"modified":"2026-09-24T10:33:48","modified_gmt":"2026-09-24T13:33:48","slug":"kenya-gambling-operators-raise-paybill-concerns-ahead-of-court-ruling","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/focusgn.com\/africa\/kenya-gambling-operators-raise-paybill-concerns-ahead-of-court-ruling","title":{"rendered":"Kenya gambling operators raise Paybill concerns ahead of court ruling"},"content":{"rendered":"\n
AGOK says the court has reaffirmed existing status quo orders as concerns emerge over alleged threats to switch operators\u2019 Paybills ahead of the October 2 ruling.<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
Kenya.- The Association of Gaming Operators Kenya<\/strong> (AGOK) has raised concerns over communications allegedly issued through Safaricom by the regulator threatening to switch gambling operators\u2019 Paybills on September 24.<\/p>\n\n\n\n The issue emerged during September 21 court proceedings in Judicial Review E251 of 2026<\/strong>, an ongoing challenge to Kenya\u2019s new gambling licensing framework, according to an update issued by AGOK.<\/p>\n\n\n\n According to AGOK, the court observed that the existing status quo orders were intended to avert such threats or adverse action and indicated that the regulator should be appropriately advised by its counsel. <\/p>\n\n\n\n The proceedings also addressed outstanding filings<\/strong>. AGOK said counsel for the petitioner informed the court that the respondents had yet to file their response to the substantive motion, meaning the petitioner had not yet filed its submissions.<\/p>\n\n\n Counsel for the respondents was granted three days to file the response. The petitioner was then given three days to file a supplementary affidavit<\/strong>, if necessary, followed by a further three days for the respondents to file their submissions. The court maintained October 2, 2026 as the ruling date.<\/p>\n\n\n\n The September 21 proceedings form part of a wider legal challenge to Kenya\u2019s new gambling licensing framework<\/strong>. The case was brought by Thomas Buckley Opar Owuor and Ken Brance against the Prime Cabinet Secretary, the Gambling Regulatory Authority of Kenya and the Attorney General. AGOK and Safaricom are interested parties in the case.<\/p>\n\n\n\n The applicants are challenging Kenya\u2019s Gambling Control (Licensing) Regulations, 2026, including provisions relating to licence fees and gambling-capital requirements. The High Court initially stayed implementation of the regulations in July before narrowing the stay in August<\/a> to the increased fees and gambling-capital requirements. Other provisions were allowed to take effect.<\/p>\n\n\n\n The court subsequently allowed the regulator to process licence applications <\/strong>under the new framework while the substantive challenge continued.<\/p>\n\n\n\n The Paybill issue also forms part of the wider regulatory dispute, with mobile-money payment channels used by gambling operators to process transactions. The 2026 gambling conduct regulations require payment service providers to have regulatory approval to process or settle gambling payments. <\/p>\n\n\n
Wider court case background<\/h2>\n\n\n\n