The participants are Musa Mngadi<\/strong>, CEO of the African Lotteries and Gaming Association (ALGA); Robin Bennett<\/strong>, head of compliance at the Western Cape Gambling and Racing Board (WCGRB); Peter Emolemo Kesitilwe<\/strong>, CEO of the African iGaming Alliance; and John Mutua<\/strong>, chief executive officer at the Association of Gaming Operators Kenya (AGOK).<\/p>\n\n\n\n For Musa Mngadi<\/strong>, CEO of the ALGA, the starting point is to avoid judging regulatory performance by revenue figures alone.<\/p>\n\n\n\n He argues that the gambling sector involves a \u201chuge and complex ecosystem of stakeholders\u201d who are affected both directly and indirectly. In that context, \u201cregulatory success is relative and one cannot look at an indicator like the gross gambling revenue (GGR) in isolation as a metric for success\u201d.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Mngadi says that while the double-digit growth seen in these jurisdictions is encouraging, and helps explain why they represent 70 per cent of Africa\u2019s gaming revenue, ALGA and its stakeholders are also concerned that this growth may be unsustainable. His point is that other African countries should be careful not to mistake rapid expansion for long-term regulatory health.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Robin Bennett<\/strong>, head of compliance at the WCGRB, believes other regulators should focus less on severity and more on effectiveness.<\/p>\n\n\n\n In his view, the key lesson from South Africa, Kenya and Nigeria is that regulation works best when it is built on \u201cclarity, certainty and consistency\u201d. Strong frameworks, he says, must be matched by practical implementation, with regulators actively engaging licence holders in a balanced and sustainable way.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Bennett also stresses that stakeholder engagement is critical. Operators need to understand what is expected of them, trust that sanctions will apply when rules are broken, and believe that those rules will be enforced consistently. He adds that responsible gambling measures must be mandatory and enforceable, while visible action against illegal operators is \u201cnon-negotiable\u201d.<\/p>\n\n\n\n In the digital era, Bennett argues, “regulators cannot be effective without leveraging technology at a level comparable to operators, alongside strong collaboration with other enforcement stakeholders such as payment providers and financial intelligence units. Crucially, decisive and visible enforcement against illegal operators is non-negotiable\u2014without it, even the strongest regulatory frameworks are undermined, and the integrity of the entire industry is put at risk.”<\/p>\n\n\n\n For Peter Emolemo Kesitilwe<\/strong>, CEO of the African iGaming Alliance, the main lessons can be reduced to three principles: balance, adaptability and collaboration.<\/p>\n\n\n\n First, he warns that over-taxation and layered tax structures tend to drive players offshore, whereas stable and proportionate frameworks improve channelisation. Second, he argues that regulation must be adaptive, because technology, payments and online behaviour evolve faster than legislation.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Third, Kesitilwe says that the most effective systems are those in which regulators, tax authorities and industry stakeholders work together instead of operating in silos. In his words, sustainable growth depends on \u201cgetting the fundamentals right: clarity, consistency, and cooperation\u201d.<\/p>\n\n\n\n John Mutua<\/strong>, chief executive officer at the AGOK, takes a country-by-country approach and identifies a distinct lesson in each of the three leading jurisdictions.<\/p>\n\n\n\n He argues that South Africa\u2019s main failure is \u201cstructural lag\u201d, because its provincial licensing model “was built for casinos and fixed-location bookmakers, and online betting has spent years operating around a framework never designed for it. The law didn\u2019t anticipate the product, and that gap is now its hardest enforcement problem.”<\/p>\n\n\n\n By contrast, Mutua sees Nigeria\u2019s success in sequencing. In his view, the country allowed the market to scale first and then built the NLRC around existing market realities, instead of imposing a framework that operators would simply work around. At the same time, he says: “The risk now is consolidation \u2014 folding 36 fragmented state regimes into one coherent national structure without losing the operators who came in good faith.”<\/p>\n\n\n\n For Kenya, Mutua argues that the long-standing problem was years of fragmented oversight: “GRA, KFCB, FRC, KRA, and the Communications Authority, each holding a piece of the puzzle with no single owner accountable for the whole. Licensing decisions, advertising standards, and content rules all sat in different hands, which meant nobody was actually in control. The Gambling Control Act 2025 is the correction \u2014 one regulator, one set of rules, one point of accountability,” he says.<\/p>\n\n\n\n For other African jurisdictions, Mutua\u2019s conclusion is direct: “The lesson for everyone else isn\u2019t which laws to copy. It\u2019s this: build the institution before the market outgrows it, not after.”<\/p>\n\n\n\n Disclaimer: A fifth contribution may be added as this discussion continues.<\/em><\/p>\n\n\nGrowth is not success on its own<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
Clarity, consistency and enforcement<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
Balance, adaptability and cooperation<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
Build institutions before the market outruns them<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
![\"\"](\"https:\/\/focusgn.com\/africa\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/7\/2025\/08\/photo-1585433013633-75f802e06715-300x200.jpg\")
<\/p>\n